Fiduciary Oversight
Fiduciary Oversight
Tax-exempt organizations exist to serve a public or charitable purpose. When an organization’s net earnings or assets inure to the private benefit of any individual, it risks losing its tax-exempt status—and, more fundamentally, it violates the basic covenant underlying the tax exemption.
Private benefit is not always obvious. It extends beyond direct payments or transactions. It includes indirect benefits, sweetheart deals, excessive compensation, preferential terms, and arrangements that give insiders advantages not available to the general public or other similarly situated parties.
Private benefit can manifest in many forms:
The most effective protection against private benefit violations is disciplined fiduciary governance:
The board must approve all significant transactions involving insiders or related parties. This includes employment relationships, consulting arrangements, loans, leases, and service contracts.
Organizations should maintain written conflict of interest policies that require disclosure of financial interests and define procedures for handling conflicts.
For organizations with salaried executives, periodic benchmarking studies help ensure that compensation is reasonable in light of the organization’s mission, size, and geographic context.
Specific procedures should govern transactions between the organization and insiders or related entities, including comparative analysis and documentation.
The IRS examines private benefit issues closely, particularly in Form 990 audits. Areas of particular scrutiny include:
Organizations can reduce fiduciary risk through practical governance measures:
The goal is not to prevent organizations from engaging insiders—nonprofits regularly employ founders, board members’ families, and other insiders. The goal is to do so transparently, on terms that are reasonable and comparable to what would be available from unrelated parties, and with appropriate board oversight and documentation.